Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
Clin Oral Investig
; 27(12): 7881-7888, 2023 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37993703
2.
Comparison of the expression of the volumetric alteration artifact in cylindrical and triangular fields of view in two cone-beam computed tomography devices.
Clin Oral Investig
; 26(1): 1025-1033, 2022 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34324084
3.
The effect of voxel and field of view size on the volumetric alteration artifact of high-density materials with 2 cone beam computed tomography devices.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
; 137(3): 290-300, 2024 Mar.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37980244
4.
Reproducibility and diagnostic value of a new wedge-guided bitewing image receptor-holding device.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol
; 51(3): 20210186, 2022 Mar 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34464551
5.
Does the angulation between the maxillary central incisors and the nasopalatine canal differ among sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns? A CBCT study.
Int Orthod
; 20(2): 100636, 2022 06.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35599206
6.
Development and validation of two new image receptor-holding devices for overlapping reduction of proximal surfaces in bitewing radiography: a preclinical study.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol
; 50(4): 20200449, 2021 May 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33353388